EPSP Team's publications
Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Foot and Mouth Disease - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue EFSA Journal Année : 2021

Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Foot and Mouth Disease

Søren Saxmose Nielsen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Julio Alvarez
  • Fonction : Auteur
Paolo Calistri
  • Fonction : Auteur
Elisabetta Canali
  • Fonction : Auteur
Julian Ashley Drewe
  • Fonction : Auteur
Bruno Garin-Bastuji
  • Fonction : Auteur
José Luis Gonzales Rojas
  • Fonction : Auteur
Christian Gortázar Schmidt
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mette Herskin
  • Fonction : Auteur
Virginie Michel
  • Fonction : Auteur
Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
  • Fonction : Auteur
Barbara Padalino
  • Fonction : Auteur
Paolo Pasquali
  • Fonction : Auteur
Liisa Helena Sihvonen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Hans Spoolder
  • Fonction : Auteur
Karl Ståhl
  • Fonction : Auteur
Antonio Velarde
  • Fonction : Auteur
Arvo Viltrop
  • Fonction : Auteur
Christoph Winckler
  • Fonction : Auteur
Kris de Clercq
  • Fonction : Auteur
Simon Gubbins
  • Fonction : Auteur
Eyal Klement
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jan Arend Stegeman
  • Fonction : Auteur
Sotiria‐eleni Antoniou
  • Fonction : Auteur
Inma Aznar
  • Fonction : Auteur
Alessandro Broglia
  • Fonction : Auteur
Alexandra Papanikolaou
  • Fonction : Auteur
Yves van der Stede
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gabriele Zancanaro
  • Fonction : Auteur
Helen Clare Roberts
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for foot and mouth disease (FMD). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, ii) monitoring period and iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection zone of 3 km and of the surveillance zone of 10 km are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective, and it was concluded that the protection and the surveillance zones comprise > 99% of the infections from an affected establishment if transmission occurred. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to FMD.

Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-04998335 , version 1 (20-03-2025)

Licence

Identifiants

Citer

Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, et al.. Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Foot and Mouth Disease. EFSA Journal, 2021, 19 (6), ⟨10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6632⟩. ⟨hal-04998335⟩
5 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

  • More