Publications de l'équipe EPSP
Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever - Archive ouverte HAL
Article Dans Une Revue EFSA Journal Année : 2021

Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever

Søren Saxmose Nielsen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Julio Alvarez
  • Fonction : Auteur
Paolo Calistri
  • Fonction : Auteur
Elisabetta Canali
  • Fonction : Auteur
Julian Ashley Drewe
  • Fonction : Auteur
Bruno Garin-Bastuji
  • Fonction : Auteur
José Luis Gonzales Rojas
  • Fonction : Auteur
Christian Gortázar Schmidt
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mette Herskin
  • Fonction : Auteur
Virginie Michel
  • Fonction : Auteur
Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
  • Fonction : Auteur
Barbara Padalino
  • Fonction : Auteur
Paolo Pasquali
  • Fonction : Auteur
Liisa Helena Sihvonen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Hans Spoolder
  • Fonction : Auteur
Karl Ståhl
  • Fonction : Auteur
Antonio Velarde
  • Fonction : Auteur
Arvo Viltrop
  • Fonction : Auteur
Christoph Winckler
  • Fonction : Auteur
Simon Gubbins
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jan Arend Stegeman
  • Fonction : Auteur
Sotiria‐eleni Antoniou
  • Fonction : Auteur
Inma Aznar
  • Fonction : Auteur
Alessandro Broglia
  • Fonction : Auteur
Eliana Lima
  • Fonction : Auteur
Yves van der Stede
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gabriele Zancanaro
  • Fonction : Auteur
Helen Clare Roberts
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Classical swine fever (CSF). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, details of the model used for answering these questions are presented in this opinion as well as the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Here, several recommendations are given on how to increase the effectiveness of some of the sampling procedures. Based on the average length of the period between virus introduction and the reporting of a CSF suspicion, the monitoring period was assessed as non-effective. In a similar way, it was recommended that the length of the measures in the protection and surveillance zones were increased from 15 to 25 days in the protection zone and from 30 to 40 days in the surveillance zone. Finally, the analysis of existing Kernels for CSF suggested that the radius of the protection and the surveillance zones comprise 99% of the infections from an affected establishment if transmission occurred. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CSF.

Dates et versions

hal-04887876 , version 1 (15-01-2025)

Licence

Identifiants

Citer

Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, et al.. Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever. EFSA Journal, 2021, 19 (7), pp.6707. ⟨10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6707⟩. ⟨hal-04887876⟩
44 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

  • More